I have just discovered RMIT is running what appears to be a workshop that might help change the dialogue around warnings, from a process driven by emergency agencies and government protocol, to one focussed on personal need and community activity.
This is of course close to my heart, which beats with it’s regular rhythm now:
“All disasters are local, all warnings are personal.”
It’s titled: “Human Security and Disasters: A Dialogue,” and the flyer says:
“This workshop seeks to create a productive exchange of ideas between human security and disaster management.
Human security seeks to reprioritize the central role of the state, instead locating people as the referent around which security is oriented.
Security as much as it is a practice is also an existential condition, with people experiencing greater or lesser degrees of security and insecurity as they interact with political, social and natural events.
Similarly in disaster management it is clear that disasters are primarily human events. The exposure of people and the vulnerability of communities to disaster events are key predictors in the level of disaster risk.
Disaster risk reduction policies can thus equally address underlying conditions of social inequality and work towards a broader goal of human development. Given these shared goals, this workshop will create dialogue on the differing methods and terminologies with a view to energizing the respective approaches to addressing conditions of human insecurity and vulnerability. This workshop will be addressing the central thematics:
• Theorising resilience and security
• Evaluating civil-military interaction after disaster or conflict
• Addressing vulnerability and insecurity
This workshop will feature speakers representing a wide range of perspectives from research and practice and is organised by the Human Security and Disasters Program of the Global Cities Research Institute in conjunction with the Centre for Risk and Community Safety.